order responses to crime child
Victims When you see piled up at the site of a massacre it's not the time to Give equal time to the murderers. If You Were Covering the slave trade in the 19th century, you Would not Give 50 per cent to the slave ship captain, Would you focus on the slaves Who Died and on the survivors. If You are present at the liberation of an Extermination camp in Nazi Germany, You Do not search out the SS for 50 per cent of the comment. Robert Fisk
One day after the death of the governor of Caqueta in the hands of the FARC, self-described "Colombians for Peace issued a statement
in which (contrary to the evidence) doubted that the FARC were responsible for the crime. Then transcribe the relevant aside:
demand that the FARC-EP in deciding making it clear to the public if it were responsible for this crime, it would be inconceivable that after so many efforts and efforts to gain ground in the humanitarian field releases abducted, give these horrendous crimes.
Although initially became fools, for the week ending FARC, through its propaganda page,
acknowledged that kidnapped the governor to "make a political trial" and murdered (decapitated) when they felt they could be trapped (Left the body surrounded by a minefield to see if crowned a pair of police officers carambola). Blamed, of course, the Uribe government. Was supposed to hijack the police and the army should stay seated, waiting for the FARC announced the summary execution of Cuellar after the supposed trial "for corruption." Perhaps in this case death would have been more "humane", less raw. A shot in the back while brushing his teeth or something,
as deputies Valley.
After such displays of cynicism, I was hoping that Piedad Cordoba and his friends were consistent with what was said the day had and responded strongly to statements by the FARC. After all, when (shockingly) doubted the authorship, said it would be inconceivable that the FARC do something like that as they negotiated releases and peace with them. I was wrong. Piedad Cordoba for coherence is not important. The memory of the country is apparently negligible. In a statement issued within hours of the FARC, "Colombians for Peace" gives us a lesson of Christian charity and teach us that it is important to forget and forgive others (especially if the others are some men who have dedicated for several decades, forcibly recruiting young people and teach them to kill the same on behalf of "social justice").
The statement, transcribe it whole, says
Colombians for Peace reiterates its rejection to the kidnapping and subsequent murder of the Governor of Caquetá, Luis Francisco Cuellar and Javier Simón García Gutiérrez patrol by the FARC-EP, as repudiating the many acts of war in which dozens die every day Colombians in the country.
Therefore, it reiterates its decision to continue the search for ways to allow the political negotiation of the Colombian armed conflict, as the only way out of the bloodshed that has over 60 years.
express our steadfast determination to join forces to rapidly transit Colombia mechanisms for the implementation of international humanitarian law by parties involved in armed conflict, as a way to humanize the war, as are the spaces for political negotiation and peace building.
Colombians for peace accompany your pain to all victims of armed conflict.
I wonder: is this statement "fair" is the resounding answer to an unimaginable atrocity on the part of some people who claim to be the next victims, the hostages and their families? How is the conviction of murder Cuellar wild implies ("at last," say) that we must continue to believe in the good faith of that gang of murderers? Does it cost so much to be blunt (for once) to the brutality of those barbarians? How is it that some people still believe in the supposed good intentions of Piety "My only hope is PEACE Córdoba? How is it possible to admire his insulting "neutrality" and call it "courage"? Someone as astute politician, someone who can afford to ask for "more Marulanda" and continue business as usual, can not be so naive as to persist in the blind trust selflessly offered to Cano, their employers and its troops of slave children . In Mrs. Cordoba this release proves once again, with his carefully chosen words and nuances that seem to believe (and concerned) more on good faith (and name) of the FARC in the freedom and lives of victims of that band of criminals (which ultimately are potentially all Colombian civilians, as evidenced by daily with abductions and murders vile). If you are on the side of the victims, why, instead of asking for a so-called "humanization of the conflict" (continue killing and kidnapping, but small step, hopefully only poor soldiers, they seem to say) do not ask for demobilization and immediate ceasefire? Who, I wonder represent these "Colombians for Peace" in addition to themselves and their political interests?
