In the factories of meat, the man makes its disposal the beast. The animal is fed with junk. On several occasions the animal becomes ill and the blind man. But the disease develops.
disease of the beast, the beast in the debased state of pure meat, is a drama of the time. At the same time the drama is old. It is a drama of the flesh. It yal'état flesh that man named man of flesh and yal'état that man called stupid. One of the two makes the other meat that is to say the meat killed for the sake of the flesh. But in our time the animal passes the disease through meat, its meat to the flesh of man.
What may make sense in this play old and new is that today the beast transmit this disease to humans as a response.
That man at the same time can lead to the animal the ability of such a response, that this denial of any animal the respondent has previously allowed to operate without limits, "that adds mystery to what arrives. It can not lend the beast or the concerns of justice, nor equality, which would give a reason for this answer, "that has What worried man.
What is remarkable about this silent answer is that the hierarchy of the flesh is challenged by direct contagion of the beast to man. Because basically, such a transfer to reestablish communication flesh. But this transmission is not the result of a greater intention, "that should sharpen the concern of man. The meat of the beast said something to the flesh of man. What is said is said by the meat of the flesh to flesh. The message here could be the medium.
0 comments:
Post a Comment